Husqvarna 592 XP Vs Stihl 661: Unbeatable Chainsaw Battle!

A challenge is only fair when both sides are evenly matched. For instance, you can’t have a spar between a Casio and a Rolex. Yes, both of them might have their own benefits, but the competition won’t be fair as Casio is an affordable brand, and Rolex deals with premium watches mostly.

So, the contest is only enjoyable when both parties are almost equal in terms of most of their aspects, for instance, a battle between Husqvarna 592 XP vs. Stihl 661.

Frankly, I had the chance to use both of these chainsaws; hence, I know what their greatest advantages are and what are their biggest flaws.

husqvarna 592 xp vs stihl 661

So, if you’re looking to know which one will emerge victorious in a showdown or just want to know the capabilities of these chainsaws, then I believe I can help you. Well, if you don’t feel like taking my word only then, you can check the details and judge it yourself as well.

Husqvarna 592 XP Vs Stihl 661 (Quick Overview)

Key Factor Husqvarna 592 XP Stihl MS 661
Powerhead Weight 16.3 Pounds 16.5 Pounds
Displacement 92.7 cc 91.1 cc
Fuel Capacity 29 oz 28.7 oz
Engine Power 7.6 bhp 7.2 bhp

Main Features of the Husqvarna 592 XP

Features of the Husqvarna 592 XP

  1. Quick-release Air Filter

This feature is an excellent addition to the chainsaw. It helps to keep the air filter clean and prolong its lifespan, which saves me money in the long run. And the quick-release feature on the air filter makes it easy to swap out when needed.

  1. Easy to Start     

When it comes to starting up the chainsaw, the Smart Start feature is a game-changer. It takes so much less effort to get the engine going, which is a relief after struggling with other chainsaws in the past. And the tool-less chain tensioning system makes it easy to adjust the chain on the fly without having to stop what I’m doing.

  1. Powerful Engine     

The Husqvarna 592 XP boasts a powerful X-Torq engine. This thing is seriously powerful, which makes cutting through tough materials a breeze. But what I really love about it is that it’s fuel-efficient and emits fewer emissions. That means I can get the job done without feeling guilty about harming the environment or burning through gas too quickly.

  1. Auto-tune System     

Another feature that I’ve come to appreciate is the Auto-Tune system. I don’t always have the time or energy to manually adjust the engine settings, so having the chainsaw do it automatically is a huge help. Plus, it ensures that the chainsaw always performs at its best, regardless of the conditions or altitude.

Main Features of the Stihl 661

Features of the Stihl 661

  1. High Power     

The MS 661 has an engine that’s truly impressive. Its engine displacement is 91.1 cc, and it can generate up to 7.2 hp of power. As a result, the chainsaw can easily handle heavy-duty tasks like cutting large trees or other forestry projects.

  1. Anti-Vibrate Mechanism     

This is a feature that doesn’t get enough attention. Vibration can be a real issue with chainsaws, and it can make using them for extended periods uncomfortable. But the MS 661’s anti-vibration system isolates the engine from the handlebar, reducing the vibration.

  1. Side-access Chain Tensioner     

The side-access chain tensioner on the Stihl MS 661 is a real-time-saver. With this feature, you can adjust the tension on the chain without removing the side cover. This means you can get back to work faster and spend less time fiddling with the chainsaw.

  1. Decompression Valve     

Another feature that makes starting the Stihl MS 661 even easier is the decompression valve. This valve reduces the pressure in the cylinder, so you don’t have to pull as hard on the starter rope. This is a real lifesaver when you’re using the chainsaw frequently and don’t want to tire yourself out before you even get started.

Differences Between Husqvarna 592 XP and Stihl 661

  1. Power Output

Power Output

While both chainsaws are extremely powerful, the Stihl 661 has a slight edge over the Husqvarna 592 XP in terms of power output. The Stihl 661’s 91cc engine generates 7.2 hp, slightly lower than the Husqvarna 592 XP’s 92.7cc engine, which produces 7.6 hp.

However, in practice, I’ve found that the difference in power output between the two chainsaws is hardly noticeable in most cutting situations.

That being said, the Stihl 661’s slightly lower power output may result in a slightly slower cutting speed compared to the Husqvarna 592 XP. However, in my experience, the Stihl 661’s lower power output also results in a more fuel-efficient engine.

Winner: STIHL 661

  1. Fuel Efficiency

Fuel Efficiency

We all know that fuel efficiency is essential when choosing a chainsaw. The Husqvarna 592 XP and the Stihl MS 661 are great options, but there’s a slight difference in fuel efficiency.

The Husqvarna 592 XP has an edge here thanks to its X-Torq engine, designed to reduce fuel consumption by up to 20%. This means you’ll be able to cut more wood with less fuel, which is a big plus in my book. Additionally, the X-Torq engine can cut emissions by up to 60%, which is better for the environment.

On the other hand, the Stihl MS 661 is also relatively fuel-efficient for its size. Still, it doesn’t quite match up to the fuel efficiency of the Husqvarna 592 XP. However, it’s worth noting that the Stihl MS 661 has a larger fuel tank than the Husqvarna 592 XP. So, it’s beneficial if you’re working on larger projects or need to cut through tougher materials.

Overall, both saws are excellent options, but if fuel efficiency is your top priority, then the Husqvarna 592 XP is the way to go. That being said, the Stihl MS 661 is still a fantastic saw, and its larger fuel tank might make it a better fit for some users.

Winner: HUSQVARNA 592 XP

  1. Cutting Speed and Power

Cutting Speed and Power

I can’t decide between Husqvarna 592 XP and Stihl 661 when it comes to cutting speed and power because both are great options.

The Stihl 661 has a slightly higher chain speed than the Husqvarna 592 XP, which can result in faster and more efficient cutting. This can be beneficial if you’re working on large projects and need to quickly cut through a lot of wood.

However, it’s worth noting that the Stihl 661 may not be as well-suited for cutting through dense hardwoods, as it has a different torque level than the Husqvarna 592 XP.

On the other hand, the Husqvarna 592 XP has a more robust torque, which can be especially useful for cutting through tough materials like dense hardwoods. This means that even though it may not have the same chain speed as the Stihl 661, it can quickly power through the dense wood.

Ultimately, it comes down to your preferences and the type of work you’ll do with your chainsaw. Both saws are excellent options and will get the job done well.

Winner- It’s a Tie!

  1. Weight


When choosing a chainsaw, one thing to consider is how heavy you want it to be. If you’re going to be on the move a lot, a lighter saw might be a good idea so you can make those cuts without feeling too worn out. But if you need something with more oomph, a heavier option might be the way to go.

The Husqvarna 592 XP weighs around 16.3 pounds, while the Stihl MS 661 is slightly heavier at 16.5 pounds. While the weight difference is tiny, it’s still worth considering when picking one of them.

The Husqvarna 592 XP’s weight is evenly distributed, making it feel balanced and easy to maneuver. This can be particularly helpful when cutting through dense wood or working in tight spaces. Additionally, the saw’s ergonomic handles and lightweight design can help reduce fatigue and strain on your hands and arms during extended use.

The Stihl MS 661’s weight is well-distributed, but the saw feels slightly heavier, after all. This can give it a more solid feel in your hands and make it easier to cut through tough materials. However, the additional weight can tire you out when you use it for long periods.

Winner: HUSQVARNA 592 XP

  1. Emission and Environmental Impact

Emission and Environmental Impact

We all know that gasoline chainsaws aren’t exactly Mother Nature’s best friend. They spew out greenhouse gases like nobody’s business, leaving a massive carbon footprint in the air. But some chainsaws are trying to do better by incorporating eco-friendly designs that help reduce emissions.

The Husqvarna 592 XP has an X-Torq engine designed to reduce emissions while providing high power and torque. It meets strict emissions regulations and is known for its fuel efficiency.

On the other hand, the Stihl 661 also has a low-emission engine designed to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency. Both chainsaws have excellent emission control systems, but the Husqvarna 592 XP is slightly more efficient in this regard.

Now, when it comes to environmental impact, the Husqvarna592 XP has a few features that make it stand out. For one, it has a centrifugal air cleaning system that ensures the air entering the engine is free from dust and debris.

Winner: HUSQVARNA 529 XP

  1. Price

Price difference

First off, it’s important to note that both chainsaws are on the higher end of the price spectrum. Depending on where you’re buying from and what accessories you’re getting, you can expect to pay anywhere from $1,200 to $1,500 for the Husqvarna 592 XP or the Stihl 661.

The Husqvarna 592 XP is a newer model with a larger engine than the Stihl 661, coming in at 92cc versus Stihl’s 91.6cc.

Overall, both chainsaws are fantastic options for heavy-duty use, and the price difference between them is negligible. It really comes down to personal preference and what features you prioritize.

If you want the latest and greatest technology, the Husqvarna 592 XP might be your better choice. But if you value reliability and a proven track record, the Stihl 661 is a great option.

Winner: STIHL 661

Husqvarna 592 XP Vs. Stihl 661: Which Chainsaw is the King of the Forest?

First off, both of these saws are absolute beasts when it comes to power and performance. They’re both excellent tools for cutting through large trees and handling tough jobs in the forest.

That being said, there are some critical differences between the two. The Stihl 661 has better vibration dampening, which can be a big deal if you use it for extended periods.

On the other hand, the Husqvarna 592 XP has better air filtration, which helps keep the engine running smoothly for a long time.

Ultimately, the decision between the two comes down to personal preference and what you need in a chainsaw. Both are excellent tools that will serve you well in your projects, but you’ll want to choose the one that best fits your needs and preferences.

stihl 661 chainsaw

Stihl MS 661 [WINNER]

Check Latest Price

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Stihl 661 have an automatic oiling system?

Yes, the Stihl 661 has an automatic oiling system that keeps the chain and bars lubricated while you work. This helps prevent friction and damage to your chainsaw, and you can adjust the amount of oil based on what you’re cutting and the environment you’re working in.

Can the Husqvarna 592 XP be converted to a sawmill setup?

You can convert the Husqvarna 592 XP to a sawmill setup with the right gear and know-how. Since this chainsaw has a powerful engine and a longer bar length option, it’s a good fit for sawmill use.

Does the Stihl 661 have a quick-release air filter for easy maintenance?

The Stihl 661 has a quick-release air filter that makes maintenance super easy. This air filter is a big deal for any chainsaw since it stops junk and dust from wrecking the engine. But, with the Stihl 661, you can quickly get to the filter and clean it without tools.

A Few Final Words

Both chainsaws have their pros and cons, so it depends on what you’re looking for in a chainsaw. I’ve personally used the Stihl 661 for a while now, and it’s been awesome. The Husqvarna 592 XP is more eco-friendly, but the Stihl 661 gives you more bang for your buck in terms of power.

Anyway, I hope my article on the differences between the Husqvarna 592 XP and Stihl 661 has been helpful in figuring out which one will work better for you. Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *